Minutes for the Undergraduate Curriculum Committee
Feb. 18, 2003
Members in Attendance: R. Monroe, C. Bachman, M. Mesbahi, T. Carter (for Wiseman), C.C. Hung, J. Fadyn, G. Conrey, R. Schroeder, R. Richardson
Ex-officio attendees: M. Murphy, R. Aynsley, A. Gabrielli, L. Whitenton
Guests: L. Cochrane, B. Nuhfer-Halten, H. Smith, P. Carden, S. Duggins, R. Rutherfoord
In Tom Wiseman’s absence, Richard Monroe served as Committee Chair and called the meeting to order at 12:00 pm.
Under Old Business – Monroe stated that all carry over items from the previous meeting had been handled electronically or withdrawn in favor of new proposals at this meeting.
First order of new business was the third item on the agenda:
Prof. Bernice Nuhfer-Halten presented the proposal for the Undergraduate Certificate Program in Spanish.
The committee recommended the proposal for the Undergraduate Certificate in Spanish.
Next Dean Gabrielli explained the proposals for:
Each proposal was voted on separately and all three were recommended by the committee.
Prof. Mehrdad Mesbahi presented the CET Proposals:
The committee recommended the above four proposals from CET.
After several questions from the three Deans in attendance two additional proposals were sent back to CET for revision and/or clarification.
Questions included – "Why doesn’t Continuing Ed teach this?; How are the lab hours used? And Are new graduates eligible to take the afternoon portion of the FE exam where these materials are needed?"
A concern was voiced that actual lab hours had been scheduled as 3 hours recently.
Both proposals were returned to CET.
Three Course Substitution Petitions were submitted by L. Whitenton on behalf of the following students:
Andry, Charles
Hedberg, John
Morris, Greg
Each petition involved substituting a lower level course or courses for an upper level course. There was a discussion on the merits of this type of substitution and there was also some questioning as to the differences in course content.
Prof. R. Richardson made a motion to recommend the substitutions for Andry & Hedberg and to deny the petition by Morris. A second of the motion was called for and none was given.
Monroe asked if there was a motion to approve all three petitions. The motion was made and seconded. The committee voted to recommend all three petitions with 5 yes votes, 2 no votes and 1 abstention.
Prof. G. Conrey explained the proposal from MET
The committee recommended the MET proposal.
Prof. H. Smith presented two TCOM proposals:
Both TCOM proposals from HTC were recommended by the committee.
Prof. S. Duggins explained the proposed changes to the BS in SWE curriculum
The committee recommended the three proposals from SWE.
Prof. R. Rutherfoord presented the proposed changes for IT
The committee recommended the proposals for IT.
Prof. P. Carden explained the IET proposals
The committee recommended the proposals from IET.
Those in attendance were thanked with apologies for the conflict with the Senate meeting. The meeting was adjourned at 12:59 p.m.
Respectfully submitted, Richard Monroe, UCC Secretary and Acting Chair